How do you blow a $1.7 billion merger? You buy a company with a popular brand name, dilute the brand, and sell it for a fifth of what you paid for it. This case explores the merger between Snapple Beverages and Quaker Oats, considered “one of the worst mergers of all time”. Students will understand the importance of a brand name after analyzing this case.
by: Robert J. Dolan
Click on any button below to view the available document.
Make sure you are registered and/or logged in to our site to view product documents. Once registered & approved, faculty, staff, & course aggregators will have access to full inspection copies and teaching notes for any of our materials.
If you need to make copies, you MUST purchase the corresponding number of permissions, and you must own a single copy of the product.
Electronic Downloads are available immediately after purchase. "Quantity" reflects the number of copies you intend to use. Unauthorized distribution of these files is prohibited pursuant to term of use of this website.
This product has a teaching note available. Available only to Registered Educators. Please login to view it.
After reading and discussing the material, students should:
- Discuss the success of Snapple and Gatorade prior to the merger.
- Explore Quaker’s rationale for the $1.7 billion it spent for Snapple.
- Explain why the merger failed.
- Identify opportunities for Snapple in 1997 in the hands of its new owner.